Alignment Influence on 3D Anthropometric Data Clustering
Jianwei Niu1, Zhizhong Li 1, *, Gavriel Salvendy 1, 2
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2008
First Page: 62
Last Page: 66
Publisher Id: TOERGJ-1-62
Article History:Received Date: 02/06/2008
Revision Received Date: 19/09/2008
Acceptance Date: 19/10/2008
Electronic publication date: 12/11/2008
Collection year: 2008
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Shape analysis and comparison is important to sizing system for the design of many products which require close fitting contact with the human body. However, the choice of the alignment reference can profoundly influence the shape analytical results. The objective of this case study is to demonstrate that the statistical results of the threedimensional (3D) upper heads could be different if different alignment approaches are used for the data analysis. Taking a data set of 432 upper heads as an example, this paper addressed the influence on data analysis of two alignment approaches, i.e., aligned at the centroid and aligned at the head top. K-means clustering was applied on block-based distance vectors of the upper head samples to classify the population into categories based on their shapes. Cluster membership variation of different alignment methods was examined. Results indicated that the reference can greatly influence k-means clustering results of 3D anthropometric data. Thus, alignment reference should be carefully chosen according to the specific requirements of an application.